No Action No Action No Action The internal reproduction of t The plan for the day is not je The plan for the day is being The urge to make a plan grows The complete understanding of The dynamical interpretant of The behaviour of the interroga The aim of the interrogator or zie CP 8.314 Dat plan is in ee No Action No Action No Action No Action No Action zie CP 8.314 No Action No Action No Action The question is doing its job. The aim of the interrogator or No Action The urge to answer or react in No Action No Action The weather as it seems that d The weather as it would impres The internal reproduction of t The answer on the question bei zie CP 8.314 The complete understanding of The object as represented by t No Action The object as it is in itself. The weather as it would impres The weatherconditions as they

Contents

premiss 2

It is a stormy day

3 interpretant

1 mental

 The internal reproduction of the sign as a combination of qualisigns or as a sinsign.

---------

sign

 The plan for the day is not jet being made, but in the process of being made in the interrogator as mental/physical sign.
Here we are concerned with the material contributed by the answer to the process of making a plan.

sign

 The plan for the day is being realised.

During the day the plan will show its effects. Probably it will be effective (adjusted or not according to experiences made during the day) in all kinds of other sign processes.


------


--------

2 physical

 The urge to make a plan grows stronger.

------------------

1 immediate

 The complete understanding of the answering sentence.


--------

2 dynamical

 The dynamical interpretant of the answer is the plan made for that day by the interrogator.

During the day it will be adjusted on the occasion of experiences the interrogator collets.

----------

sign

 The behaviour of the interrogator that day. This behaviour enables the interpreter of that behaviour (for instance the one that gave the answer) to make an interpretant of the mental/physical sign (the plan for the day) that the interrogator made.

--------

3 normal

 The aim of the interrogator or the effects of an answer on the plan that the interrogator is going to make for the coming day.
At this stage of analysis the normal interpretant is still not saturated. The plan being the conclusion out of:
1. Question: What is the weather today?
2. Answer: It is a stormy day

Conclusion: I will act in the following way…

--------


----------

conclusion

 zie CP 8.314
Dat plan is in eerste instantie niet zichtbaar voor de beschouwer. Het is een mentaal lichamelijk teken dat ontwikkeld wordt in het hoofd van de vragensteller.
degeen die geinteresseerd is in wat er met het antwoord gedaan wordt kan 2 dingen doen:
1 vragen naar het handelingsvoornemen voor die dag
2 afwachten en kijken wat de vragensteller feitelijk gaat doen.

plan for the day

conclusion

answer

1 emotional interpretant

3 interpretant

sentence 1

 zie CP 8.314

argument

premiss 1

What is the weather today?

3 logical interpretant

 The question is doing its job.
After the sign is internalised it may be subject to subsequent treatment and give rise to subsequent sign production. Not all steps being necessary.

1. immediate interpretant
The meaning settles itself, is valued (understanding the question)
2. dynamical interpretant
The understanding gives rise to action or refrainment from action. Looking outside, comparing this day with other days, giving the answer, etc. Making the plan, acting in accordance with the plan or deviating from the plan, etc
3. normal interpretant
In the end the interrogator may evaluate the whole process in order to estimate the usefulness of the original act of putting forth the question. The results from this may strengthen the question habit or weaken it. In other words: this result enters as additional experience in the next occurrence of the situation that originated the question.

-----------------

3 normal

 The aim of the interrogator or the effects of an answer on the plan that the interrogator is going to make for the coming day.
At this stage of analysis the normal interpretant is still not saturated. The plan being the conclusion out of:
1. Question: What is the weather today?
2. Answer: It is a stormy day

Conclusion: I will act in the following way…


-----------

2 energetic interpretant

2 physical

 The urge to answer or react in an other way makes itself felt.


-----------

1 representamen

2 object

1 (knowledge)

 The weather as it seems that day to the one that is answering the question. Stromy.

----------

2 knowledge

 The weather as it would impress itself that day and that place on anybody (including the interrogator) interested in the weather condition. Distinguishing this aspect creates room for mistakes and corrections.


-----------

1 mental

 The internal reproduction of the sign as a combination of qualisigns or as a sinsign.


--------

2 dynamical

 The answer on the question being put forward.
Properly speaking, from going to look outside until the uttered sign ' It is a stormy day'.


----------------

sentence 2

 zie CP 8.314

1 immediate

 The complete understanding of the interrogative sentence.

-------------

1 direct object

 The object as represented by the sign. The notion 'weather condition at this moment', not the specific condition of the weather at this moment.


--------

1 representamen

2 dynamical object

 The object as it is in itself. In this case, while a question is being asked, the impression (sic) of the one that is going to answer the question, for example after looking out of the window.

----------------

2 knowledge

 The weather as it would impress itself that day and that place on anybody interested in the weather condition.

------

1 (knowledge)

 The weatherconditions as they may occur that day.


--------

Axon File: c:\mijn documenten\semiosite\www\theorie\tijdelijkaxon\argument.xon
Last modified: 2000-10-02 16:51:52